Who Was B.F. Skinner?
Burrhus Frederic Skinner was an American psychologist who became one of the most influential figures in behavioural psychology. Born in 1904, he held positions at the University of Minnesota and Indiana University before joining Harvard, where he remained for most of his career.
Skinner built on earlier work in behaviourism, a branch of psychology that focuses on observable actions rather than internal mental states. He was less interested in what people think or feel and more concerned with what they do, and how their environment shapes those actions.
His ideas have had a lasting effect on education, parenting, and animal training. The principles he identified also appear in behavioural therapies and motivational strategies. While aspects of his theories remain debated, the core concepts continue to inform practice today.

Describe a behaviour that is worrying you and get expert guidance on whether it is normal for their age, what might be causing it, and practical strategies for responding.
Try our Child Behaviour Guide free, here on this site →Operant Conditioning and How It Works
Skinner's most significant contribution was his theory of operant conditioning. This describes how behaviour changes based on what happens immediately after it. Actions that lead to favourable outcomes tend to be repeated; actions that lead to unfavourable outcomes tend to decrease.
This differs from classical conditioning, studied by Ivan Pavlov with his experiments involving dogs and bells. Classical conditioning involves automatic responses to stimuli. Operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviours that the individual chooses to perform.
Skinner argued that much of what we do is shaped by past consequences. A child who receives praise for tidying their room may be more likely to do it again. A child ignored when speaking politely but given attention when shouting may learn that shouting produces results.
Skinner identified four ways consequences affect behaviour:
- Positive reinforcement: adding something pleasant after a behaviour, making it more likely.
- Negative reinforcement: removing something unpleasant after a behaviour, also making it more likely.
- Positive punishment: adding something unpleasant to make a behaviour less likely.
- Negative punishment: removing something pleasant to reduce a behaviour.
The words "positive" and "negative" here refer to adding or removing something, not good or bad. Skinner's research suggested reinforcement tends to be more effective than punishment for changing behaviour. Punishment may stop a behaviour temporarily, but reinforcement encourages the person to repeat what worked.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
The Skinner Box Experiments
Much of Skinner's research involved laboratory experiments with rats and pigeons using an operant conditioning chamber, often called a Skinner box.
In a typical experiment, a rat would be placed inside a box containing a lever and food dispenser. The rat would move around randomly until it pressed the lever by chance, releasing a food pellet. Over time, the rat learned to press the lever deliberately. This demonstrated that behaviour could be shaped by consequences without instruction or reasoning.
Skinner also experimented with different reinforcement schedules. Sometimes food appeared after every lever press; other times only after a certain number of presses, or at random intervals. Variable schedules, where rewards come unpredictably, produced the most persistent behaviour. These findings have been applied in various contexts, including research into why activities like gambling can become difficult for some people to stop: though such behaviours involve complex factors beyond simple conditioning.
Skinner's methods were groundbreaking, though contemporary psychology has developed stricter ethical guidelines for research involving animals and humans.
Applying These Ideas to Children
Parents and teachers have long used reward and consequence systems without knowing the theory behind them. Skinner's work explains why these approaches can be effective.
Consistency matters. If a behaviour is sometimes rewarded and sometimes ignored, children may become confused about expectations. Clear, predictable responses help children connect their actions with outcomes. Timing also matters: reinforcement works better when it comes soon after the behaviour.
Reinforcement can happen unintentionally. A child who receives attention for misbehaving may find that attention rewarding, even if it takes the form of criticism. Ignoring minor misbehaviour while praising good behaviour may work better than repeated telling off.
Skinner's approach focuses on observable behaviour rather than emotions. This can be useful for practical behaviour management, but children also benefit from feeling understood. A balanced approach combining clear expectations with warmth works best.
The NHS website provides information on managing behaviour in young children, and Family Lives offers support for parents dealing with challenging behaviour. Some UK schools use reward systems drawing on these principles, though practice varies. Some educational approaches limit token rewards entirely, preferring to focus on intrinsic motivation.
Behaviourism has faced criticism for neglecting internal mental processes. Cognitive psychology emphasises thought, memory, and perception in shaping action. Most contemporary approaches to child development draw on multiple frameworks rather than any single model. Understanding operant conditioning can help parents think more clearly about behaviour, but works best combined with warmth and attention to children's emotional needs.
2: biographical facts
3: Description of the theory and its importance for the child development
4: explain relevance to your childcare practice
5: references
yourls help will be much appreciated
What Schemas are used in play?
What is the social interaction n learning and development?
Thanks for this article. This is very greats.
I have used this sentences of article"Humans (the big ones as well as the little ones) often respond to verbal operant by taking advice, listening to the warnings of others, and obeying given rules and laws. The knowledge of what COULD happen if certain behaviors are chosen can be enough to keep us from acting in certain ways. Although this isn't always the case, with many lessons being learned "the hard way", the ability to benefit from the pleasant and unpleasant experiences of others as examples is a uniquely human characteristic ".
How do I cite it in mu article? I need to page number of book that you used it.
Best Warmest Regards.
Ask Kids Development a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.